Travel news you can use from The Travel Detective®
Sign up for our FREE daily or weekly newsletter

The Legal ABCs of the Costa Concordia Shipwreck

Europe, Featured Posts, Hotels & Accommodations, Italy & Greece, Safety & Security, Travel News, Travel Planning on February 6, 2012 4:10 pm

As the rescue and the recovery efforts for the Costa Concordia come to a close, the legal implications are just beginning. Legal contributor Nicole Coward breaks down all the “legalese” you need to know to understand this case.

As details surrounding last month’s Costa Concordia cruise ship disaster emerge, several questions remain: who is responsible, how will the victims be compensated and who should pay? In an international shipwreck, where conflicting laws and processes of various countries may apply, these seemingly simple questions become much more complex.

Discussion of these questions requires some understanding of “legalese” – legal terms or concepts that are probably foreign to the non-lawyer. Here are a few basic concepts you should know:

Passenger Ticket Contract: Generally, when booking a ticket, one does not realize that a binding legal contract is being formed. In reality, this is exactly what happens; the passenger ticket is a contract between the passenger and the cruise line, which lays out each party’s respective rights and obligations to one another.

Relatively speaking, passengers are provided thin protections that severely limit compensation for injuries, lost articles, trauma and other damages incurred during a voyage. Conversely, cruise lines – which largely dictate the terms of the contract – are afforded wide protections that limit their responsibilities and obligations to passengers.

As a result, the Passenger Ticket Contracts – can and will present strong obstacles to those seeking to obtain relief outside of and beyond what is stated.

Choice of Forum: A “forum” is where a legal action can be started. For example, several reports indicate that U.S. lawyers are filing actions in U.S. courts on behalf of passengers claiming injuries. However, a basic issue arises where, as with Costa Concordia ticket holders, the contract mandates that claims must be brought in the courts of Genoa, Italy.

Whether or not an action brought in a forum outside of Italy will be allowed will depend on the strength of the provisions in the ticket contract (most of which have been upheld as fair in U.S. courts) and the types of claims that are ultimately brought.

Choice of Law: Once the forum is selected, the court must choose which law to apply to resolve the claims. This can at times lead to the odd result of a court in one country being forced to understand and apply the laws of another.

For example, the Costa Concordia ticket contract dictates that Italian law be applied to any claims relating to the voyage. Even if claims are able to be brought in the U.S., those courts may be faced with applying Italian law and, where applicable, maritime or the Law of the Sea which are separate sets of laws governing international bodies of water – an exercise which may not be appealing to an American judge.

Keep reading to sees Nicole Coward recent interview with Vanity Fair’s Victoria Mather and Peter Greenberg. 

More>>

Pages: 1 2

  • Jimbrunton

    The Master, not the ‘Cruise Director’is, and always has been, the Owner’s Representative.Costa’s decision, to ‘abandon him’ presents this case with a curious complexity.If they accuse their own rep, they are ‘shooting themselves’  in the foot.Also the Master reported striking the reef as soon as it happened.Yet no one from Costa either in Italy or Carnival America, said a word.Waiting to see if the Master felt so ashamed that he accepted all the blame.A cunning and gutless ‘ploy’..He has far from done this.
                           I see this as a MAJOR problem for the Company.J.Brunton, Shipmaster..
    P.S. Was the Master really so wrong that he refused to accept proper command of a doomed ship l;ying on its side-a world first- was appropriate.There is much to debate here.Also the ‘show-boating’ of di Flaconi-the overbearing Coastguard Commander, who tried to treat the Master like ‘a little boy’ did not help.Further and FAR up the line, Carnival had allowed the ‘Cruise Director’ a fancy title for a ‘piss pot walloper” to allow his chorus girls-not seamen-to be used as Lifeboat Wardens.[No idea of command of people or seamanship].So in the emergency, panicked-and did not show.Rendering big complaints from passengers, of no one in charge.Yet therer werre plenty of filipino seaman, who WERE properly trained.Yet held to be below the Cruise Diector’s Chorus Girls.Cruise Directors must be kept RIGHT OUT of SAFETY.Or cruise revenues will drop even more..This cannot be allowed to continue.Many people think the ‘Cruise Director’ RUNS the ship.He does not, and at law is NOTHGING.But Carnival said or did nothing.All the origiinal ‘Yes Men’ appointed by the original ‘Fuhrer’ Ted Arrison still there.Huge sweeping change must be made.Or further lives will; be lost. J.B… 

  • Janessa

    Where on earth did you get the idea that people think the cruise director was in charge of the ship?  I have never heard that.  I think everyone understands that the Captain, or Master, is in charge of the ship.  

  • Nilson Joan

    Excuse me, Jimbrunton – what do you mean, “the show-boating” of DeFalco??? That Coast Guard Commander was certainly one of the first heroes in this tragic, senseless, STUPID tragedy. He treated Schettino like a “baby boy” because Schettino was a gutless coward. He abandoned his ship! 32 people have lost their lives and over 4,000 people had the scare of their lives. They are all alove thanks to the grace of God, and innumerable nameless heroes – including the locals who came out to assist the passengers in any type of boat that could float. There was NOTHING appropriate with Schettino’s behavior.